mirror of https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2.git
add RFC for blocking insecure HTTP connections across Flux
Signed-off-by: Sanskar Jaiswal <jaiswalsanskar078@gmail.com>pull/3081/head
parent
6d110cdfb1
commit
1d8105247a
@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
|
|||||||
|
# RFC-0004 Block insecure HTTP connections across Flux
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Status:** provisional
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Creation Date:** 2022-09-08
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Summary
|
||||||
|
Flux should have a consistent way of disabling insecure HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
At the controller level, a flag should be present which would disable all outgoing HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
At the object level, a field should be provided which would enable the use of non-TLS endpoints.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the use of a non-TLS endpoint is not supported, it should be made clear to users through the use of
|
||||||
|
logs and status conditions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Motivation
|
||||||
|
Today the use of non-TLS based connections is inconsistent across Flux controllers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Controllers that deal only with `http` and `https` schemes have no way to block use of the `http` scheme at controller-level.
|
||||||
|
Some Flux objects provide a `.spec.insecure` field to enable the use of non-TLS based endpoints, but they don't clearly notify users when the option is not supported (e.g. Azure/GCP Buckets).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Goals
|
||||||
|
* Provide a flag across all Flux controllers which disables all outgoing HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
* Add a field which enables the use of non-TLS endpoints to appropriate Flux objects.
|
||||||
|
* Provide a way for users to be made aware that their use of non-TLS endpoints is not supported if that is the case.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Non-Goals
|
||||||
|
* Break Flux's current behavior of allowing HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Proposal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Controllers
|
||||||
|
Flux users should be able to enforce that controllers are using HTTPS connections only.
|
||||||
|
This shall be enabled by adding a new boolean flag `--allow-insecure-http` to the following controllers:
|
||||||
|
* source-controller
|
||||||
|
* notification-controller
|
||||||
|
* image-automation-controller
|
||||||
|
* image-reflector-controller
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Note: The flag shall not be added to the following controllers:
|
||||||
|
> * kustomize-controller: This flag is excluded from this controller, as the upstream `kubenetes-sigs/kustomize` project
|
||||||
|
> does not support disabling HTTP connections while fetching resources from remote bases. We can revisit this if the
|
||||||
|
> upstream project adds support for this at a later point in time.
|
||||||
|
> * helm-controller: This flag does not serve a purpose in this controller, as the controller does not make any HTTP calls.
|
||||||
|
> Furthermore although both controllers can also do remote applies, serving `kube-apiserver` over plain
|
||||||
|
> HTTP is disabled by default. While technically this can be enabled, the option for this configuration was also disabled
|
||||||
|
> quite a while back (ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65830/).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The default value of this flag shall be `true`. This would ensure that there is no breaking change with controllers
|
||||||
|
still being able to access non-TLS endpoints. To disable this behavior and enforce the use of HTTPS connections, users would
|
||||||
|
have to explicitly pass the flag to the controller:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
spec:
|
||||||
|
template:
|
||||||
|
spec:
|
||||||
|
containers:
|
||||||
|
- name: manager
|
||||||
|
image: fluxcd/source-controller
|
||||||
|
args:
|
||||||
|
- --watch-all-namespaces
|
||||||
|
- --log-level=info
|
||||||
|
- --log-encoding=json
|
||||||
|
- --enable-leader-election
|
||||||
|
- --storage-path=/data
|
||||||
|
- --storage-adv-addr=source-controller.$(RUNTIME_NAMESPACE).svc.cluster.local.
|
||||||
|
- --allow-insecure-http=false
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Objects
|
||||||
|
Some Flux objects, like `GitRepository`, provide a field for specifying a URL, and the URL would contain the scheme.
|
||||||
|
In such cases, the scheme can be used for inferring the transport type of the connection and consequently,
|
||||||
|
whether to use HTTP or HTTPS connections for that object.
|
||||||
|
But there are a few objects that don't allow such behavior, for example:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* `ImageRepository`: It provides a field, `.spec.image`, which is used for specifying the URL of the image present on
|
||||||
|
a container registry. But any URL containing a scheme is considered invalid and HTTPS is the default transport used.
|
||||||
|
This prevents users from using images present on insecure registries.
|
||||||
|
* OCI `HelmRepository`: When using an OCI registry as a Helm repository, the `.spec.url` is expected to begin with `oci://`.
|
||||||
|
Since the scheme part of the URL is used to specify the type of `HelmRepository`, there is no way for users to specify
|
||||||
|
that the registry is hosted at a non-TLS endpoint.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For such objects, we shall introduce a new boolean field `.spec.insecure`, which shall be `false` by default. Users that
|
||||||
|
need their object to point to an HTTP endpoint, can set this to `true`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Precedence & Validity
|
||||||
|
Objects with `.spec.insecure` as `true ` will only be allowed if HTTP connections are allowed at the controller level.
|
||||||
|
Similarly, an object can have `.spec.insecure` as `true` only if the Saas/Cloud provider allows HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
For example, using a `Bucket` with its `.spec.provider` set to `azure` would be invalid since Azure doesn't allow
|
||||||
|
HTTP connections.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue