mirror of https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2.git
You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
332 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
332 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# RFC-0009 Custom Health Checks for Kustomization using Common Expression Language (CEL)
|
|
|
|
**Status:** implementable
|
|
|
|
**Creation date:** 2024-01-05
|
|
|
|
**Last update:** 2025-01-23
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
This RFC proposes to extend the Flux `Kustomization` API with custom health checks for
|
|
custom resources using the Common Expression Language (CEL).
|
|
|
|
In order to provide flexibility, we propose to use CEL expressions for defining the
|
|
conditions that need to be met in order to determine the health of a custom resource.
|
|
We will introduce a new field called `healthCheckExprs` in the `Kustomization` CRD
|
|
which will be a list of CEL expressions for evaluating the status of a particular
|
|
Kubernetes resource kind.
|
|
|
|
## Motivation
|
|
|
|
Flux uses the `kstatus` library during the health check phase to compute owned
|
|
resources status. This works just fine for all the Kubernetes core resources
|
|
and custom resources that comply with the `kstatus` conventions.
|
|
|
|
There are cases where the status of a custom resource does not follow the
|
|
`kstatus` conventions. For example, we might want to compute the status of a custom
|
|
resource based on a condition other than `Ready`. This is the case for resources
|
|
that perform intermediary patching, like `Certificate` from cert-manager, where one
|
|
should look at the `Issuing` condition to know if the certificate is being issued or
|
|
not before looking at the `Ready` condition.
|
|
|
|
We need to provide a way for users to express the conditions that need to be
|
|
met in order to determine the health of a custom resource. We seek a solution
|
|
flexible enough to cover all possible use cases that does not require changing
|
|
the Flux source code for each new CRD.
|
|
|
|
### Goals
|
|
|
|
- Provide a generic solution for users to customise the health check evaluation of custom resources.
|
|
- Provide a space for the community to contribute custom health checks for popular custom resources.
|
|
|
|
### Non-Goals
|
|
|
|
- We do not plan to support custom health checks for Kubernetes core resources.
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
### Introduce a new field `HealthCheckExprs` in the `Kustomization` CRD
|
|
|
|
The `HealthCheckExprs` field will be a list of `CustomHealthCheck` objects.
|
|
The `CustomHealthCheck` object fields would be: `apiVersion`, `kind`, `inProgress`,
|
|
`failed` and `current`.
|
|
|
|
For example, consider the following `Certificate` resource:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1
|
|
kind: Certificate
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: app-certificate
|
|
spec:
|
|
commonName: cert-manager-tls
|
|
dnsNames:
|
|
- app.ns.svc.cluster.local
|
|
ipAddresses:
|
|
- x.x.x.x
|
|
isCA: true
|
|
issuerRef:
|
|
group: cert-manager.io
|
|
kind: ClusterIssuer
|
|
name: app-issuer
|
|
secretName: app-tls-certs
|
|
subject:
|
|
organizations:
|
|
- example.com
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This `Certificate` resource will transition through the following `conditions`:
|
|
`Issuing` and `Ready`.
|
|
|
|
In order to compute the status of this resource, we need to look at both the `Issuing`
|
|
and `Ready` conditions.
|
|
|
|
The Flux `Kustomization` object used to apply the `Certificate` will look like this:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
|
|
kind: Kustomization
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: certs
|
|
spec:
|
|
interval: 5m
|
|
prune: true
|
|
sourceRef:
|
|
kind: GitRepository
|
|
name: flux-system
|
|
path: ./certs
|
|
wait: true
|
|
healthCheckExprs:
|
|
- apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1
|
|
kind: Certificate
|
|
inProgress: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Issuing').all(e, e.observedGeneration == metadata.generation && e.status == 'True')"
|
|
failed: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Ready').all(e, e.observedGeneration == metadata.generation && e.status == 'False')"
|
|
current: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Ready').all(e, e.observedGeneration == metadata.generation && e.status == 'True')"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The `.spec.healthCheckExprs` field contains an entry for the `Certificate` kind, its `apiVersion`,
|
|
and the CEL expressions that need to be met in order to determine the health status of all custom resources
|
|
of this kind reconciled by the Flux `Kustomization`.
|
|
|
|
### Custom Health Check Library
|
|
|
|
To help users define custom health checks, we will provide on the [fluxcd.io](https://fluxcd.io)
|
|
website a library of custom health checks for popular custom resources.
|
|
|
|
The Flux community will be able to contribute to this library by submitting pull requests
|
|
to the [fluxcd/website](https://github.com/fluxcd/website) repository.
|
|
|
|
### User Stories
|
|
|
|
#### Configure health checks for non-standard custom resources
|
|
|
|
> As a Flux user, I want to be able to specify health checks for
|
|
> custom resources that don't have a Ready condition, so that I can be notified
|
|
> when the status of my resources transitions to a failed state based on the evaluation
|
|
> of a different condition.
|
|
|
|
Using `.spec.healthCheckExprs`, Flux users have the ability to
|
|
specify the conditions that need to be met in order to determine the health of
|
|
a custom resource. This enables Flux to query any `.status` field,
|
|
besides the standard `Ready` condition, and evaluate it using a CEL expression.
|
|
|
|
Example for `SealedSecret` which has a `Synced` condition:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
- apiVersion: bitnami.com/v1alpha1
|
|
kind: SealedSecret
|
|
failed: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Synced').all(e, e.status == 'False')"
|
|
current: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Synced').all(e, e.status == 'True')"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Use Flux dependencies for Kubernetes ClusterAPI
|
|
|
|
> As a Flux user, I want to be able to use Flux dependencies bases on the
|
|
> readiness of ClusterAPI resources, so that I can ensure that my applications
|
|
> are deployed only when the ClusterAPI resources are ready.
|
|
|
|
The ClusterAPI resources have a `Ready` condition, but this is set in the status
|
|
after the cluster is first created. Given this behavior, at creation time Flux
|
|
cannot find any condition to evaluate the status of the ClusterAPI resources,
|
|
thus it considers them as static resources which are always ready.
|
|
|
|
Using `.spec.healthCheckExprs`, Flux users can specify that the `Cluster`
|
|
kind is expected to have a `Ready` condition which will force Flux into waiting
|
|
for the ClusterAPI resources status to be populated.
|
|
|
|
Example for `Cluster`:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
- apiVersion: cluster.x-k8s.io/v1beta1
|
|
kind: Cluster
|
|
failed: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Ready').all(e, e.status == 'False')"
|
|
current: "status.conditions.filter(e, e.type == 'Ready').all(e, e.status == 'True')"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Alternatives
|
|
|
|
We need an expression language that is flexible enough to cover all possible use
|
|
cases, without having to change Flux source code for each new use case.
|
|
|
|
An alternative that has been considered was to use `CUE` instead of `CEL`.
|
|
`CUE` lang is a more powerful expression language, but given the fact that
|
|
Kubernetes makes use of `CEL` for CRD validation and admission control,
|
|
we have decided to also use `CEL` in Flux in order to be consistent with
|
|
the Kubernetes ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
## Design Details
|
|
|
|
### Introduce a new field `HealthCheckExprs` in the `Kustomization` CRD
|
|
|
|
The `api/v1/kustomization_types.go` file will be updated to add the `HealthCheckExprs`
|
|
field to the `KustomizationSpec` struct.
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
type KustomizationSpec struct {
|
|
// +optional
|
|
HealthCheckExprs []CustomHealthCheck `json:"healthCheckExprs,omitempty"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type CustomHealthCheck struct {
|
|
// APIVersion of the custom resource under evaluation.
|
|
// +required
|
|
APIVersion string `json:"apiVersion"`
|
|
// Kind of the custom resource under evaluation.
|
|
// +required
|
|
Kind string `json:"kind"`
|
|
|
|
HealthCheckExpressions `json:",inline"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type HealthCheckExpressions struct {
|
|
// Current is the CEL expression that determines if the status
|
|
// of the custom resource has reached the desired state.
|
|
// +required
|
|
Current string `json:"current"`
|
|
// InProgress is the CEL expression that determines if the status
|
|
// of the custom resource has not yet reached the desired state.
|
|
// +optional
|
|
InProgress string `json:"inProgress,omitempty"`
|
|
// Failed is the CEL expression that determines if the status
|
|
// of the custom resource has failed to reach the desired state.
|
|
// +optional
|
|
Failed string `json:"failed,omitempty"`
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If a CEL expression evaluation results in an error, for example, looking for a field that does not exist,
|
|
the health check will fail. Users will be encouraged to test their expressions
|
|
in the [CEL Playground](https://playcel.undistro.io/). Here is where the community-maintained
|
|
[library](#custom-health-check-library) will be super useful as some of the expressions might be complex.
|
|
|
|
The evaluation logic will be as follows.
|
|
|
|
First, we check if the custom resource has a `.status.observedGeneration` field, if it does
|
|
we compare it with the `.metadata.generation` field to determine if the custom resource is in
|
|
progress. We consider it in progress if these fields differ, and don't evaluate any of the
|
|
expressions if that's the case. However, if these fields are equal there's no immediate
|
|
conclusion about the health of the custom resource, so we proceed with the evaluation.
|
|
|
|
For each of the `InProgress`, `Failed` and `Current` expressions, we evaluate the expressions
|
|
that are specified (`InProgress` and `Failed` are optional) in this specific order and return
|
|
the respective status of the first expression that evaluates to `true`. If none of the
|
|
expressions evaluate to `true`, we consider the custom resource in progress.
|
|
|
|
When the `Failed` expression is not specified the controller will keep evaluating the
|
|
`Current` expression until it returns `true`, and will give up after the timeout defined in the Kustomization's `spec.timeout` field is reached.
|
|
Users will be encouraged to provide a `Failed` expression to avoid stalling the reconciliation
|
|
loop until the timeout is reached.
|
|
|
|
### Introduce a generic custom status reader
|
|
|
|
We'll Introduce a `StatusReader` that will be used to compute the status
|
|
of custom resources based on the `CEL` expressions provided in the `CustomHealthCheck`:
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
import (
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/schema"
|
|
"github.com/fluxcd/cli-utils/pkg/kstatus/polling/engine"
|
|
"github.com/fluxcd/cli-utils/pkg/kstatus/polling/event"
|
|
kstatusreaders "github.com/fluxcd/cli-utils/pkg/kstatus/polling/statusreaders"
|
|
|
|
kustomizev1 "github.com/fluxcd/kustomize-controller/api/v1"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type CELStatusReader struct {
|
|
genericStatusReader engine.StatusReader
|
|
gvk schema.GroupVersionKind
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func NewCELStatusReader(mapper meta.RESTMapper, gvk schema.GroupVersionKind,
|
|
exprs *kustomizev1.HealthCheckExpressions) engine.StatusReader {
|
|
|
|
genericStatusReader := kstatusreaders.NewGenericStatusReader(mapper, genericConditions(gvk.Kind, exprs))
|
|
return &CELStatusReader{
|
|
genericStatusReader: genericStatusReader,
|
|
gvk: gvk,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (g *CELStatusReader) Supports(gk schema.GroupKind) bool {
|
|
return gk == g.gvk.GroupKind()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (g *CELStatusReader) ReadStatus(ctx context.Context, reader engine.ClusterReader, resource object.ObjMetadata) (*event.ResourceStatus, error) {
|
|
return g.genericStatusReader.ReadStatus(ctx, reader, resource)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (g *CELStatusReader) ReadStatusForObject(ctx context.Context, reader engine.ClusterReader, resource *unstructured.Unstructured) (*event.ResourceStatus, error) {
|
|
return g.genericStatusReader.ReadStatusForObject(ctx, reader, resource)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The `genericConditions` function takes the set of `CEL` expressions and returns a
|
|
function that takes an `Unstructured` object and returns a `status.Result` object.
|
|
|
|
```go
|
|
import (
|
|
"github.com/fluxcd/cli-utils/pkg/kstatus/status"
|
|
"github.com/fluxcd/pkg/runtime/cel"
|
|
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1/unstructured"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func genericConditions(exprs *kustomizev1.HealthCheckExpressions) func(u *unstructured.Unstructured) (*status.Result, error) {
|
|
return func(u *unstructured.Unstructured) (*status.Result, error) {
|
|
obj := u.UnstructuredContent()
|
|
|
|
// if status.observedGeneration exists and differs from metadata.generation return status.InProgress
|
|
|
|
for _, e := range []struct{
|
|
expr string
|
|
status status.Status
|
|
}{
|
|
{expr: exprs.InProgress, status: status.InProgress},
|
|
{expr: exprs.Failed, status: status.Failed},
|
|
{expr: exprs.Current, status: status.Current},
|
|
} {
|
|
if e.expr != "" {
|
|
result, err := cel.EvaluateBooleanExpr(e.expr, obj)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
if result {
|
|
return &status.Result{Status: e.status}, nil
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return &status.Result{Status: status.InProgress}, nil
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The CEL status reader will be used by the `statusPoller` provided to the kustomize-controller `reconciler`
|
|
to compute the status of the resources for the registered custom resources GVKs.
|
|
|
|
We will implement a `CEL` environment that will use the Kubernetes CEL library to evaluate the `CEL` expressions.
|
|
|
|
## Implementation History
|
|
|